Cause Effect - What's Behind ?

(link CNN)

Is it our life a deterministic or casual event ? All the facts that happen, are they

a mere accident or the fruit of a structured drawn ? Classic physic teaches us

that all relations between the events are just the result of causeeffect

reaction. Quantistic physic doesn't follow the same concept having a fuzzy

beahvior, sometime not easy to understand. Albert Einstein accepted the new

discovery, based on discrete packets energy emission, but he couldn't accept

the actually known entanglement reaction. The EPR (EinsteinPodolskyRosen)

phenomenon was just a trial to have a deterministic proof about the so

called "spooky action", which would be a simultaneously interaction between

particles, even if they are light years far from each other. Some day ago, one

more experiment, as the New York Times reported, led in Netherlands at the

Delft University of Technology, confirmed, one more time, the discovery made

from John Stewart Bell and Alain Aspect, regarding the distance relation

between partcles, despite the distance separated them. Last 25 of august, to

the Barcelona Photonic Science Institute, researchers have been able to

create a new state of matter, and that was the result of the same BellAspect

intuition. 500 atoms suddenly got in an entaglement state, giving to the life an

unknown matter state. These are very important discoveries, which confirm

that there's a very different world behind the classic physic, which could be

responsible of all the event that we call just coincidences. The famous

"butterfly effect", by Edward Lorenz, the chaos theory inventor, could have a

reason of life, as all the unexplained, illogical or misterious events, in a near

future, may be will be solved following the cited experiment. Can a falling

autumn leave be an earthquake cause ?

29 of october 2015 h. 3.29 am. Mario R. Zampella ©

Back to the Future

(link CNN)

Next 21 of october it will be celebrated a particular event: the selected future

day, inside the time machine in the movie "Back to the Future". After 30

years, there's no kind of time machine yet, at least, as information tell us. But

the time machine idea runs in the time crossing years and years. Frank Tipler,

a very tiny scientist, predicted that it was enough to reach the half light speed,

aboard a spinning disk, to visit the future. Paul Davis too, famous phisycian,

theorized a time machine able to cross the worm holes, special tunnels which

tie different time dimension. He also cited, in his book, "How to Build a Time

Machine", the Einstein Special Relativity, to visit future and past, reaching the

stop of the time, at the top of velocity, then going to the past, reaching two

times that velocity. Not possible in terrestrial contests. One other chance,

could be to travel aboard of a spiral galaxy. May be I'll try it. All of us probably

have dreamed sometime about a time travel, much has been written and

much movies have been made. If we were able to stop the time we would

become immortal, but we would remain motionless too. Would it be a good

life ?

17 of october 2015 h. 3.27 pm. Mario R. Zampella ©

Time, Mass and Space

(link CNN)

Let's try to explain some more concept about the time dimension, after the first

trial failed given that the article I wrote misteriously disappeared. As it's been

shown in the "Time, Unknown Dimension Yet" article, the time it is a changing

dimension related at its velocity. It could be demonstred, in a theorical way,

imagining to be in motionless and looking a ray light which runs aboard a

space ship at light velocity. The ray, starting from the floor to the top of the

ship, will not appear in its right line, as we are used to see, but like a

ypotenuse of a triangle rectangle. Being it longer than the vertical way that the

ray would have ran in motionless, the necessary time time to reach the top of

the ship, is longer too. It's clear that the ray lenght depends from the speed:

more fast is the space ship, more slow is the light ray velocity, until to become

infinite at the finite speed light, which is 299792 Km/s. The Einstein Relativity

Theory, explains, in mathematic language, what it happens traveling at speed

light. Newton formuled those changing states too, but they are valid just in a

terrestrial contest. Two more elements are contemplated in the Special

Relativity and they are the space and the mass. The first one, has a opposite

behavior. It doesn't become infinite, but it transforms itself in a sort of a

pancake. Practically, at the speed light, a rect line would become as zero

whilemean, a mass, would become infinite like the time. Thus, imagining

whatever you want, with mass, launched at speed light and seen from a

motionless place, it would be similar at squeezed tomato. Hard to believe, but

the picture shown above, could give the idea about the distorsions that the

objects have when the camera is traveling. Practically the opposite

phenomenon in which the object travels and the motionless eye observes.

The picture concerns some Pompei columns, curved on themselves for the

camera velocity effect.

09 of october 2015 h. 12.58 pm. Mario R. Zampella ©

Sanitary Assistance

(link CNN)

The Health Ministery of Italy is studying the spending review about the

Sanitary costs. The last idea, which is just a law project, concerns the

limitation of diagnostic examinations, to stop each abuse from doctors who

prefer to control by them rather than to risk their professionality and possible

court judgements. So the new law project provides for a punishement to all the

doctors who'll abuse of sanitary assistance. The field is very delicate, because

we have the best technology we ever had in the last century which could save

lives, and we should avoid to use it because expensive. Doctors are not happy

because they found themselves between the blade of patients and the one of

State. Beginning from the Italian Constitution, we may read that the State

guarantee each citizen health, but only the diagnostic activity is able to

confirm if a person is sick or not. So it would be logic to start from the point in

which the disease is prooved. In that case the Health Ministery must pay each

one cost concerning the cures. So, each examination should be made in a

hanging line; after it, if the patient is sane, he'll be able and happy to pay all

the costs or part of them, linked at his economic situation. At the opposite

hand, if the patient is sick, the State will provide about the cures, paying all the

costs, included the first ones from which the disease has been found. Minister

Lorenzin proposed a law which help nobody, but the State cash.

03 of october 2015 h. 10.22 am Mario R. Zampella ©